Skip to content
Main Menu
Home
About the CTU
Menu Toggle
About the CTU
Visions and missions
Services and collaboration
Useful information
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
History of the CTU
The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group
Clinical research infrastructure networks
Clinical research
Menu Toggle
Clinical research
Protocols for systematic reviews published on The Cochrane Library
Protocols for systematic reviews published on/in other journals and registers
Overview of trials conducted with the involvement of the CTU
Menu Toggle
Details on trials conducted with the involvement of the CTU
Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA)
Menu Toggle
Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA)
Learn more about the TSA
FAQ about the TSA
Download the TSA
Publications involving TSA
Tools and links
Menu Toggle
Tools and links
Publications
Menu Toggle
Publications
Articles
PhD theses, Doctoral dissertations and Master theses
Books and documentaries
Supplementary material
Contact
Menu Toggle
How to find us
Administration staff
Clinical research staff
Staff of the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group
IT and data management staff
Staff within clinical research infrastructure networks
PhD, master students and project staff
Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) staff
Search for:
Search
Bjelakovic G, Gluud LL, Nikolova D, Whitfield K, Wetterslev J, Simonetti RG, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014, 1, s. CD007470.
Figure w7 (Analysis 1.1): Funnel plot of comparison 1.1 Vitamin D versus placebo/no intervention. Outcome: 1.1 All-cause mortality in trials with a low or high risk of bias.
Figure w8: Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Vitamin D versus placebo or no intervention. Outcome: 1.7 All-cause mortality in trials using vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol)) according to risk of bias.
Figure w9: Trial sequential analysis on mortality in the 27 trials that administered vitamin D3 combined with calcium. The diversity-adjusted required information size (RIS) was calculated based on a mortality in the control group of 10%; a relative risk reduction of 5% in the experimental group; a type I error of 5%; and type II error of 20% (80% power). There was no diversity. The required information size was 110,505 participants. The cumulative Z-curve (blue line) did not cross the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit (red inward sloping line) at any time. Accordingly, the crossing of the conventional statistical 5% boundary (the horizontal brown line) may be due to random errors.
Figure w10: Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Vitamin D versus placebo or no intervention. Outcome: 1.13 All-cause mortality in trials using vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol).
Figure w11 (Analysis 1.18): Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Vitamin D versus placebo or no intervention. Outcome: 1.18 All-cause mortality in trials using alfacalcidol (1-α hydroxyvitamin D).
Figure w12 (Analysis 1.20): Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Vitamin D versus placebo or no intervention. Outcome: 1.20 All-cause mortality in trials using calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D).
Figure w13: Trial sequential analysis on cancer mortality in the four trials that administered vitamin D3. The diversity-adjusted required information size (RIS) was calculated based on a mortality in the control group of 2.85%; a relative risk reduction of 12.28% in the experimental group; a type I error of 5%; and type II error of 20% (80% power). There was no diversity. The required information size was 66,724 participants. The cumulative Z-curve (blue line) did not cross the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit (red inward sloping line). Accordingly, the crossing of the conventional statistical 5% boundary (the horizontal brown line) may be due to random errors.
Figure w14: Trial sequential analysis on cardiovascular mortality in the 10 trials that administered vitamin D3. The diversity-adjusted required information size (RIS) was calculated based on a mortality in the control group of 4.17%; a relative risk reduction (low bias based) of 1.68% in the experimental group; a type I error of 5%; and type II error of 20% (80% power). There was no diversity. The required information size was 2,539,845 participants (not shown). The cumulative Z-curve (blue line) did not cross the conventional monitoring boundary for benefit (red line) after the tenth trial, neither did it reach the trial sequential monitoring boundaries for futility (not shown).
Hello world
CLOSE